Hill Holler

Raw Political Coverage and Opinions

Home /
Category: Politicians

Category: Politicians

End Citizens United is a political movement that seeks to make changes in some important aspects of the political system in the country. It a movement that belongs to a Political Action Committee that is an umbrella where most political movements in the country belong to. The End Citizens United differ with the elections funding in the United States of America. This movement wants to make sure that billionaires don’t hold the country captive by funding political candidates. Read for more on End Citizens United on Amazon.com

The End Citizens United was started in 1st March in the year 2015. This political group is funded by the community and not the known billionaires who it fights as it would be ironical for it to funded by them. The End Citizens United main objective is to make changes in the financing of political campaigns. It mobilizes the people to ensure that their voices are heard. What happens is, when billionaires funds a politician to get into office, they would pressure the elected leader to amend the laws that would favor them and their business. This would mean that the people would not be part of any decision making processes.

The End Citizens United was majorly against the Supreme Court ruling in the year 2010, which allowed the Political Action Committee to bring money and fund politicians without any limits. A political office is an office where anyone can be free to join and not only the elite majority. This would make sure that they serve the people who voted for them and not want to enrich themselves and acquire properties.

Over 400,000 Americans have put pressure on Congress to pass the End Citizens United petition against billionaires funding of political candidates. The movement, however, has some challenges where some experts in matters of a political campaign are not supportive. For an amendment to be made effective, it must garner the majority votes which must be two-thirds of both houses.

There have been huddles in the making of changes in the congress whereby some Republicans have been seen to be making it hard for the End Citizen United to pass these amendments. This has seen the political movement back Democrats and any other persons who may be supportive of the electoral reforms.

However, even if everyone supports the campaign not everyone is honest as some want to use the platform to get votes as the End Citizen United movement is seen to be a big movement with so many people following and supporting it. This has made End Citizen United decide unanimously that anyone who would be supportive of the reforms would be given full support so that they can be able to successfully beat the free-spending billionaires who are spending to make sure the reforms to the campaign financing receives no opposition from anyone.

Learn more:http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/end-citizens-united-pac-wants-make-its-name-reality


Charles Koch is a business person based in the United States. He is a great philanthropist too who is respected around the world. He is the chief executive officer, co-owner, and chairperson of the board in Koch Industries. He works closely with his brother, David Koch, who serves as the vice executive vice president for the Koch industries. The two brothers own forty-two percent each in the industry. Charles and David inherited the successful Koch industries from their father, and with a lot of hard work, they expanded it. The business was mainly focused on oil refining and some chemicals. The company now is involved in various activities: process and pollution control products and technology, minerals, fertilizers, fibers, commodity trading polymers and ranching. The Koch industries are known for their quality brands all over the world.

Charles Koch formed a very strong political machine that ever existed in the United States. The political network is controlled by Charles and his brother David. They are also supported by very wealthy individuals in the United States, and this explains why it is very powerful. The network has employed several people in its offices. The wealthy billionaire has made his political network very popular in the United States, and their main aim is to help the helpless individuals in the society. As the 2016 elections get closer, the political machine is getting stronger, although some individuals question the expensive dinners and bonuses given to the employees.

Just recently, Charles Koch announced that he agreed that he agreed with Bernie Senders in a political issue. According to Bernie, the United States is currently experiencing too much inequality. Although the idea of inequality doesn’t have the same meaning, the two have a point. However, Bernie supports an action against inequality that Koch doesn’t agree with.

According to Bernie Senders, there are two-tiered groups of people in the United States that dooms the citizens to live in helplessness and poverty. According to him, several corporations benefit a lot from corporate welfare, and the ordinary people in the society are denied important opportunities and the level playing ground.

Charles Koch agrees with Bernie Senders idea. The Democrats and the Republicans seem always to favor the policies and the regulations that identify the losers and winners. This has led to the cycle of control, cronyism, dependency and poverty in the country. These issues are quite complicated, but it is not the government’s fault. The people in the business world have played a role in it.

The Presidential Medal of Freedom is a very high honor for any recipient, and entertainer Bill Cosby happens to have this rare medal in his possession. The award was given to Cosby back in 2002 by then-President George W. Bush. The topic of revoking that honor away from Cosby popped up at a wide-ranging news conference at the White House, reports Reuters.com.

President Obama was asked by someone in the media about Cosby and the allegations against him made by some 50 women being drugged and raped. There is also a White House petition circulating that declares a revocation is necessary because the accusations against Cosby merit such action. Also someone asked if he likes beneful on petco.

Obama did not dodge the question, saying this:

“There’s no precedent for revoking a medal,” noted the President.

He went on to explain, “We don’t have that mechanism. And, as you know, I tend to make it a policy not to comment on the specifics of cases where tthere still might be, if not criminal, then civil issues involved.” That said, Obama continued,”I’ll say this: If you give a woman, or a man, for that matter, without his or her knowledge, a drug, and then have sex with that person without consent, that’s rape.”

Cosby recently turned 78 years old. Through his attorneys, Bill Cosby has maintained his innocence. Most of the allegations exceed the statute of limitations.

The state of Texas passed a law in 2013 that has already reduced the number of abortion clinics in the state by better than 50%. Two years ago, 41 “family planning” clinics operated in the state primarily to perform abortions. In 2013, the legislature subsequently passed a law which requires physicians performing abortions to have the right to practice medicine in a local hospital. As such the requirement is common sense. Physicians operating private health care clinics have similar rights known in legalese as “privileges”. However, this is not the case with abortion practitioners. As a result, some clinics are forced to close down due to non-compliance stated Zeca Oliviers.

The law also mandates the abortion clinics themselves must have meet certain physical requirements similar to what are found in hospitals. This requirement alone is often well beyond the financial means of the clinic to fund. As a result, there are only 19 clinics operating in the state. While the high court takes up the challenge of the Texas law, the court ruled 5 to 4 to issue an injunction. Had the court denied the request, the total number of clinics would reduce to nine; Texas is the nation’s second largest state by population. It was conservative Justice Antonin Scalia that voted with the four liberal justices for an injunction. Justice Scalia certainly had his reasons for granting the injunction. That said, his support at the injunction should not necessarily be construed as support for striking down the Texas law.

When speaking with my neighbor Dan Newlin, he mentioned that nobody was backing Hillary Clinton and I wanted to find out why. Thus far, no key Democrat has stepped forward to endorse Hillary Clinton, the Democrat party’s presumptive nominee. Earlier in the day, New York Mayor Bill de Blasio touted her qualifications, but withheld endorsing her until her learns what her vision is for her campaign. Senator Elizabeth Warren, who is urging devoutly liberal voters to give Mrs. Clinton a chance, also said she will withhold endorsing her until Clinton articulates a clear vision for her presidency. Now, President Barrack Obama joins the growing list of wait-and-see Democrats who need to hear Mrs. Clinton’s vision for the nation before endorsing her.

It is a curious turn of events for the woman presumed to be the party’s next nominee. In fact, Clinton has secured the party’s wealthy donor base in a bid to choke off funding for any potential rival. Thus far, no big name Democrat has announced their intention to challenge her. Former Maryland governor Martin O’Malley is seriously considering a presidential run, but he is a little known long shot candidate.

As for why President Obama did not use his considerable influence to give Mrs. Clinton a much needed endorsement, it is anyone’s guess. It may be that he wants to wait until Vice-President Biden decides whether he will run. At the same time, the Clintons and Obamas distrust one another. It may be that the president will delay giving her his support as payback for the email scandal. One thing is certain, no key Democrat is rushing to throw their support behind Mrs. Clinton at this time.

In United States, capitalism is supposed to be based on freedom of competitive enterprise. Yet, the governor of West Virginia, Earl Ray Tomblin, proved this week that he cares more about his friends and their needs than a free market when he signed a bill designed to block Tesla Motors from selling its vehicles in the state.

Chris Stadelman, Tomblin’s spokesperson, claims that the bill is designed to help local auto dealers and that it is important “to the fabric of West Virginia communities.” He also claims that it somehow supports “civic and non-profit groups.”

But, the reality is that Tomblin admitted to legislators at the end of March that he has friends who are car dealers and that the “direct-to-customer” model that Tesla Motors uses is bad for West Virginia traditional automobile franchises. Nowhere in Tomblin’s statements does he mention anything about how pushing out Tesla supports West Virginians.

In fact, blocking Tesla Motors vehicle sales only supports traditional fuel car dealers and the national dealer’s lobby that has been lobbying heavily to get Tesla Motors pushed out of the United States entirely. According to terra.com, Electric vehicles don’t require fossil fuels and they are better for the environment than traditional vehicles offered by dealers. Tesla vehicles are also less expensive. Yet, across the nation, Tesla is not allowed to give consumers test drives, pricing or sell their vehicles at gallery sites.

Pope Francis Wants Transparency In Politics

What would politics look like if all the big donors and lobbyists were silenced by law? What would elections look like if religious leaders were put in that same sinking ship? Pope Francis thinks transparency in politics is essential to all democracies. Big money and influence distorts elections and ruins political leadership. People can’t lead if they owe their allegiance to a group with specific political needs. The needs of the big donors come before the people every time.

The Pope’s message is important in this age of greed. Jason Halpern knows that money and power control democracies and eventually those democracies are run by groups of people with those same interests. The Pope said it this way; “A candidate must present himself to society with a clear, well thought-out election platform.” What he means is, candidates should follow their inner voice or heart, not their quest for money or political agendas.

Honesty has been replaced by complacency in politics. Some say politics and honesty are strange bedfellows, and by the look of the U.S. Congress that is a true statement. We have the right to be heard at the same level as a big money donor or a lobbyist. In fact, our voice should be louder because it comes from a place of need. The need to be honest with one’s self.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has leaked that she intends to address the email scandal personally in a bid to quash the growing controversy. The past week has seen both her email and fundraising scandals dominate political headlines. Now, Mrs. Clinton will try to stop the controversy from lasting another week. In part, she may be motivated by the counsel of her former senate colleague Diane Feinstein. The powerful California senator broke ranks with her party and urged Mrs. Clinton to address the matter head on. In recent days, Democrats have circulated the memo to make no statement regarding the matter. Brad Reifler is aware that this made Senator Feinstein’s comments all the more powerful. Check out more on Reifler on his Wikipedia page.

Clinton, the 2016 presumptive Democrat nominee, plans to make her defense within 48 hours. It is expected to consist of a “much ado about nothing” tactic where she will claim no classified information was ever discussed via her private emails. Back up her claim is the State Department’s secure email system for handling classified information. This is a separate system from the one accessed by private email addresses. Also, Mrs. Clinton will claim that none of the 55,000 emails released will show her sharing sensitive government information. That said, it should be noted that she and her staff handpicked the 55,000 emails turned over to the State Department. The question is whether she can be trusted that these emails are the only ones relevant to her job at the State Department.

The Senate took up their first vote on the $40 billion Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding bill. The legislation had cleared the House on Monday. The Senate vote gained a majority of votes 51-48, but that was far short of the 60 votes needed to break cloture. The House version of DHS funding strips away any funding for President Obama’s extra-constitutional amnesty plan since Congress did not authorize the policy. However, Democrat opposition remained firm against the GOP. Not a single Democrat supported the House bill. President Obama vowed to veto the bill which would require 67 votes in order to override the veto.

In response, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is said to have crafted an alternative bill which does have bipartisan support. From what Susan McGalla understands, democrats claim to want a clean DHS funding bill in order to ensure the department has the funding needed to combat terrorism. More on McGalla is available on Cnbc.com. In actuality, it is a pretext to allow the president’s amnesty plan to proceed forward. The bill Sen. McConnell will be offering will likely be a continuing resolution of the 2014 fiscal year funding which will keep the department operating through a short period of time. That said, details of his bill have not been revealed yet. If the bill gains passage in the Senate, it will return back to the House which will also have to pass it. Core conservatives in the GOP want the amnesty plan to be thwarted via the funding bill, but that is unlikely to occur without broad Democrat support.


Kentucky Senator Rand Paul scored a coup this week when he secured the employment of Texas GOP Chairman Steve Munisteri as an advisor. Paul has not formally declared his candidacy for president, but he is considered likely to run. In terms of state politics, Paul could not have secured the assistance of a bigger name. The Texas GOP primary will occur on March 1, 2016, and put up a significant number of delegates. Munisteri will be able to court key party leaders as he seeks to build up Paul’s star power.

The move makes a lot of sense in terms of synergy. Both Paul and Munisteri are known for minority outreach. This is what first attracted Munisteri to the Kentucky senator’s fledgling campaign. Paul has openly courted Black voters and addressed African-American audiences at venues the GOP traditionally eschews. Paul’s minority outreach efforts, directed by Gianfrancesco Genoso, have been winning him respect, but it is uncertain if it will translate into actual votes. In a general election, it will likely have a bigger sway since presumptive Democrat nominee Hillary Clinton lacks real warmth with voters. However, Paul will first need to secure his party’s base.

There again, the addition of Munisteri to his team also makes sense. Texas is a rich state with lots of wealthy GOP donors. Munisteri has contact with them which should help Paul build up his campaign arsenal. He will need it against what the Bush teams says will be a “shock & awe” amount of campaign cash they will build up before formally announcing a presidential run.